NOVACOR HOME CLINICAL APPLICATIONS ORTHOSTATIC HYPOTENSION



Orthostatic hypotension


CLINICAL CONTEXT

Orthostatism hypotension is defined as a decrease of at least 20 mmHg in systolic or 10 mmHg in diastolic blood pressure within 2 to 3 minutes after getting up.

In normal individual, standing up causes pooling of blood in the venous capacitance vessels of legs and trunk. The abrupt fall in central blood volume causes a rapide decline in venous return and, subsequent to this, a fall in cardiac output that results in reduced BP. Baroreceptors in the aortic arch and carotid sinuses activate sympathetic mediated autonomic reflexes that normalize BP rapidly by causing transient tachycardia.

Impairment of the autonomic reflex arc by diseases or drugs, depressed myocardial contractility or vascular responsiveness, hypovolemia can cause orthostatic hypotension which, if sufficiently profound, can produce cerebral hypoperfusion or syncope.

The diagnosis is based on the history and clinical evaluation of the patient. Additionnal tests (Tilt-table test, Valsalva test) can be performed to further document autonomic function (Tilt table test) or the integrity of baroreceptor reffex (Valsalva test).

Diasys Integra II, Triolter and Quattrolter feature intelligent patient position monitoring to provide the physician with enriched data for orthosatic hypotension evaluation:
- Patient position for each BP measurement
- Additionnal BP measurements automatically triggered on patient getting up.


Patient suffering orthostatic Hypotension
(Diasys Integra II recording, HolterSoft Ultima software)



NOVACOR'S SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS

Validation d'un capteur de position intégré au moniteur de mesure de pression artérielle en ambulatoire (MAPA) Diasys NOVACOR


La pression artérielle de sujets normotendus enregistrée en MAPA est-elle différente, en période d'activité, si le patient est debout ?


Ambulatory blood pressure variation in normotensive subjects in relation to the sitting or standing position

The determination of ambulatory blood pressure in very elderly hypertensives: effect of lying or sleeping in the day

Effect of position on the ambulatory measurement of QKd interval in very elderly hypertensives

Blood pressure surge on rising


Validation d'un capteur de position intégré au moniteur de mesure de pression artérielle en ambulatoire (MAPA) Diasys NOVACOR

Jean-Michel Mallion, Jean-Louis Quesada, Régis de Gaudemaris, Sophie Boutelant, Jean-Philippe Siché, Jean-Philippe Baguet, Frédéric Tremel
Médecine Interne et Cardiologie. CHU Grenoble

Objectif
Il peut être intéressant, plus particulièrement dans le cadre des dysautonomies, de connaître à chaque mesure d'une MAPA, si le sujet est en position debout. Ce travail étudie la fiabilité des informations de position, verticale ou non, du sujet fournies par un nouveau capteur.
Méthodologie
Chez 27 sujets normotendus volontaires âgés de 20 à 60 ans le capteur spécifique de position est placé sur la face antéro-externe de la cuisse, pendant le port du moniteur de MAPA DIASYS INTEGRA. Deux capteurs et trois moniteurs Integra sont ainsi testés de façon séquentielle.
Au moment de chacune des mesures automatiques, le patient note, sur une feuille d'activité, sa position (debout ou non). L'analyse des informations, fournies par le capteur et la feuille d'activité des patients, permet de tester le niveau de concordance entre ces données (test de Kappa). En moyenne, 16 changements de position sont ainsi enregistrés lors de chaque MAPA.
Résultats
Le tableau présente les concordances et divergences globales entre les positions des patients évaluées par questionnaire ou de manière automatique lors de chaque mesure.

Position évaluée par NOVACOR     Couché     Debout    Total
Position selon questionnaire
Couché                              195         24      219
Debout                                8        176      184
Total                               203        200      403


Discussion

Le test de kappa global, calculé (0,84) permet de conclure à une très bonne concordance entre informations manuelles et automatiques à chaque mesure de MAPA. L'analyse de chaque couple capteur-moniteur montre que chez 5 patients le coefficient Kappa n'est que de l'ordre de 0,45 ,sans que l'on puisse conclure définitivement à un dysfonctionnement particulier de l'un de ces couples ou à des erreurs humaines. La performance du capteur apparaît ainsi satisfaisante, il reste à préciser l'intérêt de ces infomations d'orthostatisme couplées aux mesures en MAPA dans le cadre de pathologies particulières (ex : dysautonomie).

TOP OF PAGE



La pression artérielle de sujets normotendus enregistrée en MAPA est-elle différente, en période d'activité, si le patient est debout ?

Jean-Michel Mallion, Jean-Louis Quesada, Régis de Gaudemaris, Sophie Boutelant, Jean-Philippe Siché, Jean-Philippe Baguet, Frédéric Tremel
Médecine Interne et Cardiologie. CHU Grenoble.

Objectif
La mise au point d'un capteur de position placé sur la cuisse permet, à chaque mesure, de savoir si le patient est en position debout ou en position assis-couché. Ce travail cherche à comparer les mesures tensionnelles observées dans ces deux types de position pendant la période d'activité.
Méthodologie
La PA est mesurée toutes les 15 minutes en ambulatoie (MAPA) entre 7h et 22h chez 14 volontaires normotendus (âge moyen : 36,6 +- 14 ans, 6 hommes / 8 femmes), à l'aide d'un moniteur DIASYS INTEGRA (NOVACOR , FRANCE) par méthode oscillométrique. Un capteur de position dont la fiabilité à été préalablement validée (test de concordance kappa = 0,84) est placé sur la cuisse. L'horizontalité ou la verticalité du capteur définissent respectivement la position assise-couchée, versus debout. Le lever après une latence de plus de 16 minutes en position couchée ou assise déclenche automatiquement trois mesures supplémentaires (à 1, 3 et 6 minutes). Les comparaisons de niveaux tensionnels sont faites par un test de Student et, par un test de Student-Newman-Keuls de comparaisons multiples lors de l'étude des variations au lever.
Résultats
Chez ces sujets normotendus en activité on note, entre les mesures assis-couché versus debout une élévation significative (p<0.001) pour la PAS (126.6 +- 15 mmHg vs 131 +- 15 mmHg), la PAD (78 +- 11mmHg vs 81 +- 13 mmHg) et la FC (77 +- bpm vs 87 +- 12 bpm). Le tableau montre chez ces sujets en activité, l'évolution moyenne de la PA et de la FC avant puis dans les minutes qui suivent le passage de la position assis-couchée à debout.

Variations de pression en passage à la position debout

                 av lever      1min.ap     3min.ap     6min.ap
nb de mesures         127          121         116          75
PAS (mmHg)      125,2+-14    131,4+-18   132,9+-16   131,9+-14
PAD (mmHg)         78+-11     81,5+-13    82,2+-14    76,8+-11
FC (bpm)         76,9+-10     88,4+-12    83,9+-11    83,3+-12


Lors du passage en orthostatisme, la PAS s'élève significativement (p<0,05) après le lever et reste en plateau jusqu'à la 6ème minute. la PAD s'élève significativement au lever mais retrouve le niveau de repos à la 6 ème minute. La FC s'élève significativement après une minute d'orthostatisme, puis elle chute significativement à partir de la 3 ème minute où elle reste en plateau.
Conclusion
Cette étude confirme que connaître la position des patients lors des mesures de MAPA peut être un atout supplémentaire dans l'interprétation de ces examens; les chiffres présentés peuvent servir de référence pour les sujets normotendus. Il importe maintenant de valider cette approche en recherche clinique : étude des sujets dysautonomiques, étude du comportement des anti-hypertenseurs sur l'orthostatisme.

TOP OF PAGE



Ambulatory blood pressure variation in normotensive subjects in relation to the sitting or standing position

Jean-Michel Mallion, Sandrine Mouret, Jean-Philippe Baguet, Anne Martre, Jean-Louis Quesada, Regis De Gaudemaris
Objective
To evaluate the physiological variations in arterial blood pressure in normotensive subjects during activity and in relation to the sitting or lying position.
Methods
The subjects were 30 healthy volunteers who were normotensive and receiving no treatment. Blood pressure was measured using the validated monitor Diasys Integra (NOVACOR SA, Rueil-Malmaison, France) with an integral position sensor. Blood pressure was recorded every 15 min over a 24 h period, additional measurements being made in the first, third and sixth minutes after standing up.
Results
During the active period (1000-2000 h), 53% of the measures were made in the standing position. Over this period, the values of systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBF) and heart rate were significantly elevated in the standing position in comparison to the sitting position. The difference was of the order of 5 mmHg for the SBP, 3.5 mmHg for the DBF and 9 beats/min for the heart rate. The SBP, DBF and heart rate measured in the first, third and sixth minutes after standing up were not significantly different. Conclusion When measuring the blood pressure and heart rate in ambulatory patients, it seems justified to evaluate the patient's position during monitoring in order to achieve a better reproducibility and also to uncover any problems of blood pressure control with positional change, as could exist in patients with autonomic dysfunction. This might also aid in evaluating antihypertensive treatment and also any deleterious hypotensive effects. Blood Press Monit 5:169-173 © 2000 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Blood Pressure Monitoring 2000, 5:169-173
Keywords: ambulatory blood pressure, setting, standing, healthy volunteers, clinical application
Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Grenoble University Hospital, Grenoble, France
Correspondence and requests for reprints to Jean-Michel Mallion, Grenoble University Hospital, BP217-38043 Grenoble Cedex 9, France
Received 12 January 2000 Revised 14 May 2000 Accepted 10 May 2000
1359-5237 © 2000 Lippincott Will

TOP OF PAGE



The determination of ambulatory blood pressure in very elderly hypertensives: effect of lying or sleeping in the day


E. Pinto, C.J.Bulpitt, N.Beckett, R.Peters, W.Banya, c.Nachev, V.Gergova, S.Nedogoda, L.Thijs, J.A.Staessen, C.Rajkumar. On behalf of the HYVET Investigators. Imperial College London, UK, Hospital St Anna, Sophia, Bulgaria, Hospital Alexandrovska, Sophia, Bulgaria, Volgograd Medical, Academy, Volgograd, Russia, University of Leuven, Belgium.

Background
This is the fist study in very elderly hypertensives to report ambulatory blood pressure measurements in relation to the patient's position during day time.

Objective
To determine ambulatory blood pressure in very elderly hypertensives (aged 80 years or more) and to report results according to body position, lying or sitting/standing.

Design and methods
This study is a side-project of the Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET). HYVET aims to investigate the effect of active treatment on outcom in hypertensive patients aged 80 years or more. ABPM (ambulatory blood pressure monitoring) is carried out annually using the Diasys Integra II monitor (Novacor, France). Daytime measurements were taken every half-hour from 10 am to 8 pm. This monitor also records the patient's position (lying or sitting/standing) simultaneously with each BP measurement.

Results
Results of 50 patients with 3 or more readings in both the lying and sitting/standing position (mean age 84 +/- 3.7 yeards s.d.) who were in the placebo phase or already randomised to either active or placebo treatment in eight participating centres. Daytime SBP was 128.1 +/- 15 mmHg. When values for only sitting/standing patients were used SBP was133.6 +/- 17 mmHg. For measurements during the day when the patients were lying down SBP decreased to 118.7 +/- 17 mmHg (p<0.001). Daytime DBP was 76.6 +/- 10 mmHg, sitting/standing-day time 81.1 +/- 12 mmHg and lying down 69.0 +/- 9 mmHg (p<0.001). The HR values were 75.6 +/- 9 beats/min, 79 +/- 10 beats/min sitting/standing and 70.2 +/- 9 beats/min lying down (p<0.0001).

Conclusion
The lower pressures when lying are thouyght to be due to sleeping or resting. In very elderly patients, it is important to account for body position in the interpretation of the day time ambulatory blood pressure recordings.

J. Hypertens., 2004, 22:S22, P1.7

TOP OF PAGE



Effect of position on the ambulatory measurement of QKd interval in very elderly hypertensives


E. Pinto, C.J.Bulpitt, N.Beckett, R.Peters, W.Banya, C.Nachev, D.L.Dumitrascu, R.Antikainen, V.Stoyanovsky, M.Comsa, F.Dockery, J.A.Staessen, C.Rajkumar. On behalf of the HYVET Investigators. Imperial College London, UK, Hospital St Anna, Sophia, Bulgaria, UMF Cluj Napoca, Cluj Romania, Oulu City Hospital, oulu, Finland, National Multiprofile Transport Hospital, Sophia Bulgaria, Cabinet Medical Comsa Marius, Fagaras, Romania, University of Leuven, Belgium.

Background
Arterial compliance is know to decrease with age and conditions such as hypertension. No studies, however, have reported the effect of position on the ambulatory measurement of arterial compliance.

Objective
To determine the effetc of the body position on arterial compliance in very elderly hypertensives by measuring ambulatory QKD intervals during daytime.

Design and Methods
This study is a side-project of the Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (Hyvet). HYVET aims to investigate the effect of active treatment on outcome in hypertensive patients aged 80 years or more. The measurement of the QKD interval (Q wave (ECG) to Korotkoff Diastole sound) interval over a 24hr period is carried out annually using the Diasys Integra II monitor (Novacor, France). Daytime measurements were taken every half-hour from 10am to 8 pm. This monitor also records the patient's position (lying or sitting/standing) simultaneously with each BP measurement.

Results
Results of 37 patients (age 84 +/- 4 years, mean +/- s.d.) with 3 or more readings in both the lying and sitting/standing position who were in the placebo run-in phase or already randomised to either active or placebo treatment in eight participating centres were analysed in this study. The daytime QKD interval (10 am to 8 pm) was 180.7 +/- 19 ms (178.7 +/- 20 ms sitting/standing versus 182.6 +/- 21 ms lying, NS). SBP was 133 +/- 13 mmHg and HR 78 +/- 11 beats/min sitting/standing and 117 +/- 15 mmHg and 70 +/- 10beat/min lying. Adjusted for systolic blood pressure (100 mmHg) and heart rate (60 beats/min), the QKD100-60 for daytime was 200 +/- 9 ms. The QKD100-60 for lying position was 196 +/- 10 ms and for standing was 205 +/- 8 ms (p=0.0001).

Conclusions
We conclude that QKD interval is not affected by position unless corrected for systolic blood pressure and heart rate.

J.Hypertens., 2004, 22:S115, P1.340

TOP OF PAGE



Blood pressure surge on rising


P. Gosse, R. Lasserre, C. Minifié, P. Lemetayer, J. Clementy
Hôpital Saint-André, Bordeaux, France

Objective
Since cardiovascular complications tend to occur more often in the morning, it is tempting to link to the surge in BP on rising. This was verified in a cohort of hypertensive patients (HT).

Design and Methods
We performed 24h ABPM along with a measurement of BP on rising (either manually or automatically from the device coupled with a position sensor) in 507 untreated HT. Left ventricular mass (LVM) was measured with echo at baseline. HT were the treated and followed by their GP and news were obtained at regular intervals (mean follow-up = 92 +/- 36 months). Surge in BP was the difference between measurement triggered in the minute following rising and the last measurement within the 30' before.

Results
Rising led to a mean increase of 14 mmHg in SBP and a 13 bpm increase in HR without significant correlation between the two. The increase in SBP on rising was linked with the overall variability in SBP (standard deviation, p<0.001), but independent of the mean 24h SBP. It was associated with LVM at baseline (linear regression, p<0.05) and an increased risk of future cardiovascular complications (Cox model, p<0.01) independently of age and average 24h SBP.



Conclusions
SBP surge on rising was associated with LVH and an increased risk of cardiovascular complications independently of age and average 24h SBP.

J.Hypertens., 2004, 22:1113-1118

Download the article (.PDF)

TOP OF PAGE